New study co-led by Griffith University calls for rethinking wildlife tourism

A new discussion paper, co-authored by Griffith University’s Associate Professor Georgette Leah Burns, raises serious ethical concerns about the use of non-human animals in tourism contexts, particularly in captivity activities.

The new study co-led by Griffith University has highlighted extreme examples – such as orangutan kickboxing for the entertainment of tourists – do little to educate or develop conservation motivation for myriad animal species around the world.

As urbanisation and habitat destruction erode opportunities for humans to meaningfully interact with wild animals in their natural environments, the growing wildlife tourism industry has emerged as a key space for these encounters. 

The study exploresd how non-consumptive wildlife tourism – where animals were not hunted or killed – could still result in significant harm. 

Beyond welfare concerns such as stress or poor living conditions, these encounters had potential to distort the public perception of animals and the broader human-animal relationship. 

The authors called for moving past an “anthropocentric viewpoint” and examining how animals were positioned in tourism through the lens of objectification and visibility, and predominantly at the sake of their agency.

A stark example was the orangutan kickboxing shows at Safari World Bangkok and similar parks. 

Associate Professor Burns notes “here, orangutans were costumed in bikinis or uniforms and forced to perform human-like tricks with often sexualised undertones, such as imitating intercourse or dancing provocatively – all for the amusement of tourists.

“These practices not only harm animal welfare but also constitute profound violations of dignity and respect. Such objectification reduces sentient beings to spectacles, denying their subjectivity and autonomy.” 

The team emphasised that the problem was not captivity itself, but the specific ways animals were made visible and consumed by the tourist gaze. 

To address these issues, Associate Professor Burns urged wildlife tourism that aligned with an “ethics of sight”, an approach that fostered respectful, meaningful encounters and portrayed animals as subjects rather than objects. 

Associate Professor Burns added “activities should be structured to encourage understanding of animals as individuals with intrinsic value, rather than as mere entertainment.

“As wildlife tourism continues to grow, this work challenges the industry to reassess its ethical foundations and move toward more compassionate and respectful models of engagement.”

The study ‘What’s Wrong with Orangutan Kickboxing Shows? Scrutinizing Wildlife Tourism as a Form of Visual Consumption’ has been published in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 

Image. Orangutan Kickboxing Credit: Shutterstock