Jump! Swim Schools faces court over ACCC claims it misled franchisees
In documents lodged with the Federal Court yesterday, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has alleged that learn-to-swim facility franchisor JUMP! Swim Schools to court, misled over 90 franchisees by failing to deliver their fit-outs, leaving them hundreds of thousands of dollars out of pocket.
In just the latest case of alleged franchisee exploitation in the sector, the ACCC will allege Jump! and Director Ian Campbell made a series of false, misleading or deceptive statements in breach of Australian Consumer Law.
The ACCC has been investigating the company in the wake of reporting by the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, which earlier this year published allegations Jump accepted fees to construct pools for franchisees, but left them hanging.
The ACCC has today claimed over 90 franchisees had not received an operational swim school within 12 months of handing over between $150,000 and $175,000 in fees, while some are still waiting.
Commenting on the case, ACCC Chair Mick Keogh stated “we allege this conduct caused substantial harm to franchisees who paid significant sums but did not receive an operational swim school within the time specified, or at all.”
The prosecution comes less than two months after the main trading company behind Jump Swim collapsed into voluntary administration, although existing franchisees are still trading.
Jump Director Ian Campbell, who was awarded Australian Emerging Franchisor of the Year by the oft-criticised Franchise Council of Australia (FCA) in 2016, is also being prosecuted.
Campbell denies the ACCC allegations and says he will contest the claims in court.
Citing a slowdown in the swim school site approval process in recent years, Campbell argues delays experienced by franchisees are the result of red tape challenges.
He advised “our position with that is there is a number of factors and approvals required. We’re not opening a local corner shop, we need approvals from a whole range of bodies.”
However, SmartCompany has reported ACCC allegations that Campbell had no reasonable basis for telling franchisees their swim schools would be operational within 12 months, arguing he “wrongfully accepted payment”.
In its statement of claim sent to the Federal Court yesterday, the ACCC said it had three versions of a brochure allegedly sent to prospective franchisees, claiming those who bought in would be provided with an operational franchise within 12 months.
Keogh added “Jump Swim continued to accept payments when it knew, or ought to have known at the time it accepted the payments, that the timing for its delivery of operational franchises was dependent on events that were outside its control.”
Campbell denies this, advising “we don’t believe we did promise people a 12-month time frame or represent that, we believe we have a range of supporting materials.”
The ACCC alleges 88 franchises were left waiting for longer than 12 months, experiencing an average wait time of 540 days, and in some cases longer than three years.
The ACCC last week applied for an asset freezing order against Campbell and his associate companies Swim Loops Holdings, Jump Loops and associated entities Jump Swim Schools Construction, Jump Swim Schools Leasing, Jump Swim Schools, Blue Paddle, Reef Services and JS Reef.
Image: Ian Campbell.
Related Articles
Published since 1997 - Australasian Leisure Management Magazine is your go-to resource for sports, recreation, and tourism. Enjoy exclusive insights, expert analysis, and the latest trends.
Mailed to you six times a year, for an annual subscription from just $99.
Get business and operations news for $12 a month - plus headlines emailed twice a week. Covering aquatics, attractions, entertainment, events, fitness, parks, recreation, sport, tourism, and venues.